Grayslake, IL vs Irvine, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 178). Irvine leads in walk score (44 vs 28). Irvine leads in average commute (25.8 min vs 28.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Irvine, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 67.2 (#1452) |
| Population | 20,954 | 307,670 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $1,517,431 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $116,519 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 25.8 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 44 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 9.5 |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 178 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | D+2.6 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grayslake for: