Grayslake, IL vs Lancaster, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Lancaster
61.5
#1905 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 22.9). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $71,367). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 126).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Lancaster, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 61.5 (#1905) |
| Population | 20,954 | 166,236 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $465,459 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $71,367 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 30.9 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 29 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 22.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 126 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | D+32.9 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
D-
61.5 Score
Lancaster, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$465,459
Population
166,236
Crime
High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lancaster, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grayslake for: