Grayslake, IL vs Newark, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Newark
62.4
#1861 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 10.4). Newark leads in walk score (57 vs 28). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 195).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Newark, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 62.4 (#1861) |
| Population | 20,954 | 46,929 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $1,202,648 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $159,465 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 31.2 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 57 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 10.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 195 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | D+53.6 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
D-
62.4 Score
Newark, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,202,648
Population
46,929
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
57
Pacific
View Newark, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grayslake for: