Grayslake, IL vs Sugar Land, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Sugar Land
75
#525 nationally
Sugar Land leads in median household income ($132,247 vs $110,662). Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 2.1). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 125).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Sugar Land, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 75 (#525) |
| Population | 20,954 | 108,515 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $449,277 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $132,247 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 30 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 125 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | D+1.6 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
C
75 Score
Sugar Land, TX
Mid-size Texas city with community character
Median Home
$449,277
Population
108,515
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Southwest
View Sugar Land, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Grayslake for: