Grayslake, IL vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Tulsa
74
#654 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 25.8). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $56,648). Tulsa leads in average commute (18.6 min vs 28.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Grayslake, IL | Tulsa, OK |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.3 (#362) | 74 (#654) |
| Population | 20,954 | 411,894 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $374,561 | $220,759 |
| Median Household Income | $110,662 | $56,648 |
| Average Commute | 28.7 min | 18.6 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 39 |
| Crime Level | 1.8 | 25.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 108 | 92 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+20.8 | R+55.8 |
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
C
74 Score
Tulsa, OK
Growing Oklahoma city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$220,759
Population
411,894
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
39
Southwest
View Tulsa, OK →