Gresham, OR vs Lathrop, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Gresham
65.6
#1622 nationally
Lathrop
61.6
#1896 nationally
Gresham leads in walk score (47 vs 29). Lathrop leads in median household income ($108,732 vs $69,437). Gresham leads in average commute (27.5 min vs 42.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Gresham, OR | Lathrop, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.6 (#1622) | 61.6 (#1896) |
| Population | 110,685 | 39,857 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $470,730 | $632,887 |
| Median Household Income | $69,437 | $108,732 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 42.9 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | 29 |
| Crime Level | 11.2 | 8.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 124 | 142 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+62.1 | R+0.9 |
D
65.6 Score
Gresham, OR
Mid-size Oregon city with community character
Median Home
$470,730
Population
110,685
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Gresham, OR →
D-
61.6 Score
Lathrop, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$632,887
Population
39,857
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lathrop, CA →