Gresham, OR vs Leominster, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Gresham
65.6
#1622 nationally
Leominster
65.5
#1631 nationally
Gresham leads in crime level (11.2 vs 13.3). Gresham leads in walk score (47 vs 41). Leominster leads in median household income ($75,620 vs $69,437).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Gresham, OR | Leominster, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.6 (#1622) | 65.5 (#1631) |
| Population | 110,685 | 43,627 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $470,730 | $475,889 |
| Median Household Income | $69,437 | $75,620 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 27.8 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 11.2 | 13.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 124 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+62.1 | D+10.0 |
D
65.6 Score
Gresham, OR
Mid-size Oregon city with community character
Median Home
$470,730
Population
110,685
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Gresham, OR →
D
65.5 Score
Leominster, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$475,889
Population
43,627
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
41
Northeast
View Leominster, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Gresham for: