Gresham, OR vs Porterville, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Gresham
65.6
#1622 nationally
Porterville
68.7
#1299 nationally
Gresham leads in median household income ($69,437 vs $55,785). Gresham leads in walk score (47 vs 40). Porterville leads in average commute (24 min vs 27.5 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Gresham, OR | Porterville, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65.6 (#1622) | 68.7 (#1299) |
| Population | 110,685 | 62,876 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $470,730 | $332,442 |
| Median Household Income | $69,437 | $55,785 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 24 min |
| Walk Score | 47 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 11.2 | 10.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 124 | 112 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+62.1 | R+20.7 |
D
65.6 Score
Gresham, OR
Mid-size Oregon city with community character
Median Home
$470,730
Population
110,685
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Gresham, OR →
D+
68.7 Score
Porterville, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$332,442
Population
62,876
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Pacific
View Porterville, CA →