Hialeah, FL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Hialeah
67.6
#1400 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $49,531). Hialeah leads in walk score (68 vs 41). Hialeah leads in cost of living index (116 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Hialeah, FL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.6 (#1400) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 221,300 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $445,442 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $49,531 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 29.3 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 68 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 8.7 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 116 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.4 | R+2.1 |
D+
67.6 Score
Hialeah, FL
Growing Florida city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$445,442
Population
221,300
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
68
Southeast
View Hialeah, FL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Hialeah for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: