Holladay, UT vs Sanger, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Sanger
68
#1364 nationally
Holladay leads in crime level (2.7 vs 13.3). Holladay leads in median household income ($106,099 vs $69,333). Sanger leads in walk score (48 vs 36).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Holladay, UT | Sanger, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.6 (#1185) | 68 (#1364) |
| Population | 30,298 | 26,343 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $851,133 | $416,982 |
| Median Household Income | $106,099 | $69,333 |
| Average Commute | 19.4 min | 24.1 min |
| Walk Score | 36 | 48 |
| Crime Level | 2.7 | 13.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 139 | 120 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.2 | R+4.4 |
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →
D+
68 Score
Sanger, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$416,982
Population
26,343
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Sanger, CA →