Holladay, UT vs Schaumburg, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Schaumburg
76.1
#384 nationally
Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 28.1 min). Schaumburg leads in cost of living index (114 vs 139). Schaumburg leads in walk score (43 vs 36).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Holladay, UT | Schaumburg, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.6 (#1185) | 76.1 (#384) |
| Population | 30,298 | 75,750 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $851,133 | $364,930 |
| Median Household Income | $106,099 | $92,818 |
| Average Commute | 19.4 min | 28.1 min |
| Walk Score | 36 | 43 |
| Crime Level | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 139 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.2 | D+42.0 |
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →
C
76.1 Score
Schaumburg, IL
Illinois community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$364,930
Population
75,750
Crime
Low
Walk Score
43
Midwest
View Schaumburg, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Holladay for: