Hurst, TX vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Hurst
72.7
#844 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Hurst leads in cost of living index (105 vs 159). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $71,275). Hurst leads in average commute (24.9 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Hurst, TX | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#844) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 39,304 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $339,279 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $71,275 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 24.9 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 49 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 9.7 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+5.1 | R+2.1 |
C-
72.7 Score
Hurst, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$339,279
Population
39,304
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
49
Southwest
View Hurst, TX →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Hurst for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: