Irvine, CA vs Kirkland, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Kirkland
68
#1358 nationally
Kirkland leads in median household income ($135,608 vs $116,519). Kirkland leads in walk score (51 vs 44). Kirkland leads in average commute (25.5 min vs 25.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | Kirkland, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 68 (#1358) |
| Population | 307,670 | 91,194 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $1,212,741 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $135,608 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 25.5 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 51 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 1.7 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 179 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | D+51.7 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
D+
68 Score
Kirkland, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,212,741
Population
91,194
Crime
Low
Walk Score
51
Pacific
View Kirkland, WA →