Irvine, CA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Irvine leads in walk score (44 vs 24). McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 178). Irvine leads in average commute (25.8 min vs 30.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 307,670 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 24 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | Very Low |
| School Rating | 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | R+11.2 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →