Irvine, CA vs San Fernando, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
San Fernando
65.7
#1616 nationally
San Fernando leads in walk score (79 vs 44). Irvine leads in median household income ($116,519 vs $70,950). San Fernando leads in cost of living index (150 vs 178).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | San Fernando, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 65.7 (#1616) |
| Population | 307,670 | 23,364 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $752,797 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $70,950 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 29.5 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 79 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 9.9 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 150 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | D+32.9 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
D
65.7 Score
San Fernando, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$752,797
Population
23,364
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
79
Pacific
View San Fernando, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Irvine for: