Irvine, CA vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
Irvine leads in walk score (44 vs 15). Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 25.8 min). Washington leads in cost of living index (122 vs 178).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Irvine, CA | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.2 (#1452) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 307,670 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,517,431 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $116,519 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 25.8 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 15 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 4.1 |
| School Rating | 9.5 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 178 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+2.6 | R+52.3 |
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Irvine for: