Lancaster, CA vs Port Arthur, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lancaster
61.5
#1905 nationally
Port Arthur
77.7
#224 nationally
Lancaster leads in median household income ($71,367 vs $45,357). Port Arthur leads in cost of living index (85 vs 126). Port Arthur leads in average commute (23 min vs 30.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lancaster, CA | Port Arthur, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.5 (#1905) | 77.7 (#224) |
| Population | 166,236 | 55,547 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $465,459 | $125,021 |
| Median Household Income | $71,367 | $45,357 |
| Average Commute | 30.9 min | 23 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 33 |
| Crime Level | 22.9 | 19.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 126 | 85 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+8.9 |
D-
61.5 Score
Lancaster, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$465,459
Population
166,236
Crime
High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Lancaster, CA →
C+
77.7 Score
Port Arthur, TX
Texas community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$125,021
Population
55,547
Crime
High
Walk Score
33
Southwest
View Port Arthur, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lancaster for: