Laurel, MD vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Laurel
66.4
#1547 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in crime level (8.0 vs 10.8). Laurel leads in walk score (53 vs 41). Laurel leads in cost of living index (125 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Laurel, MD | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.4 (#1547) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 29,400 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $478,130 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $92,035 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 33.5 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 53 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 10.8 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 125 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+13.9 | R+2.1 |
D
66.4 Score
Laurel, MD
Small Maryland city with local appeal
Median Home
$478,130
Population
29,400
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
53
Northeast
View Laurel, MD →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Laurel for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: