Los Angeles, CA vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Los Angeles
60.9
#1917 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 31.4 min). Los Angeles leads in walk score (68 vs 40). Pittsfield leads in cost of living index (107 vs 173).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Los Angeles, CA | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 60.9 (#1917) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 3,822,238 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $946,268 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $74,891 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 31.4 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 68 | 40 |
| Crime Level | Moderate-High | 14.0 |
| School Rating | 5.4 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 173 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+39.9 |
D-
60.9 Score
Los Angeles, CA
Entertainment capital of the world
Median Home
$946,268
Population
3,822,238
Crime
Moderate-High
Schools
C
Pacific
View Los Angeles, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Los Angeles for: