Lufkin, TX vs San Fernando, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Lufkin
78.1
#197 nationally
San Fernando
65.7
#1616 nationally
San Fernando leads in walk score (79 vs 25). Lufkin leads in average commute (17.3 min vs 29.5 min). Lufkin leads in cost of living index (91 vs 150).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Lufkin, TX | San Fernando, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 78.1 (#197) | 65.7 (#1616) |
| Population | 34,181 | 23,364 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $200,713 | $752,797 |
| Median Household Income | $57,938 | $70,950 |
| Average Commute | 17.3 min | 29.5 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 79 |
| Crime Level | 14.5 | 9.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 91 | 150 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+52.0 | D+32.9 |
C+
78.1 Score
Lufkin, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$200,713
Population
34,181
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southwest
View Lufkin, TX →
D
65.7 Score
San Fernando, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$752,797
Population
23,364
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
79
Pacific
View San Fernando, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Lufkin for: