Matthews, NC vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Matthews
68.7
#1294 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 16). Matthews leads in crime level (5.1 vs 8.0). Matthews leads in cost of living index (116 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Matthews, NC | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.7 (#1294) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 30,934 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $514,763 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $103,405 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 26.9 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 16 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.1 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 116 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+2.1 |
D+
68.7 Score
Matthews, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$514,763
Population
30,934
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
16
Southeast
View Matthews, NC →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Matthews for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: