McKinney, TX vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 30.2 min). McKinney leads in walk score (24 vs 15). McKinney leads in median household income ($108,542 vs $94,655).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | McKinney, TX | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.5 (#726) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 208,867 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $480,265 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $108,542 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 30.2 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 24 | 15 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 4.1 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | R+52.3 |
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap McKinney for: