Melbourne, FL vs Pittsburg, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Melbourne
69.9
#1158 nationally
Pittsburg
62
#1881 nationally
Melbourne leads in average commute (22.5 min vs 39.2 min). Melbourne leads in crime level (7.6 vs 12.6). Pittsburg leads in median household income ($98,408 vs $60,917).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Melbourne, FL | Pittsburg, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.9 (#1158) | 62 (#1881) |
| Population | 86,960 | 75,803 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $360,012 | $566,408 |
| Median Household Income | $60,917 | $98,408 |
| Average Commute | 22.5 min | 39.2 min |
| Walk Score | 33 | 39 |
| Crime Level | 7.6 | 12.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 146 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+20.8 | D+38.0 |
D+
69.9 Score
Melbourne, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$360,012
Population
86,960
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southeast
View Melbourne, FL →
D-
62 Score
Pittsburg, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$566,408
Population
75,803
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Pittsburg, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Melbourne for: