Melbourne, FL vs Torrance, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Melbourne
69.9
#1158 nationally
Torrance
64.2
#1714 nationally
Torrance leads in walk score (67 vs 33). Melbourne leads in cost of living index (105 vs 195). Torrance leads in median household income ($109,554 vs $60,917).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Melbourne, FL | Torrance, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.9 (#1158) | 64.2 (#1714) |
| Population | 86,960 | 139,224 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $360,012 | $1,117,906 |
| Median Household Income | $60,917 | $109,554 |
| Average Commute | 22.5 min | 27.8 min |
| Walk Score | 33 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 7.6 | 8.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 195 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+20.8 | D+32.9 |
D+
69.9 Score
Melbourne, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$360,012
Population
86,960
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southeast
View Melbourne, FL →
D
64.2 Score
Torrance, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,117,906
Population
139,224
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View Torrance, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Melbourne for: