Murfreesboro, TN vs Newark, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Murfreesboro
65
#1659 nationally
Newark
62.4
#1861 nationally
Newark leads in walk score (57 vs 25). Newark leads in median household income ($159,465 vs $70,451). Murfreesboro leads in cost of living index (109 vs 195).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Murfreesboro, TN | Newark, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65 (#1659) | 62.4 (#1861) |
| Population | 165,430 | 46,929 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $430,142 | $1,202,648 |
| Median Household Income | $70,451 | $159,465 |
| Average Commute | 27.3 min | 31.2 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 57 |
| Crime Level | 11.5 | 10.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 109 | 195 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.8 | D+53.6 |
D
65 Score
Murfreesboro, TN
Mid-size Tennessee city with community character
Median Home
$430,142
Population
165,430
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southeast
View Murfreesboro, TN →
D-
62.4 Score
Newark, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,202,648
Population
46,929
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
57
Pacific
View Newark, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Murfreesboro for: