Murfreesboro, TN vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Murfreesboro
65
#1659 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 25). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $70,451). Murfreesboro leads in cost of living index (109 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Murfreesboro, TN | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65 (#1659) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 165,430 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $430,142 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $70,451 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 27.3 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 11.5 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 109 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.8 | R+2.1 |
D
65 Score
Murfreesboro, TN
Mid-size Tennessee city with community character
Median Home
$430,142
Population
165,430
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southeast
View Murfreesboro, TN →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Murfreesboro for: