Murfreesboro, TN vs Redlands, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Murfreesboro
65
#1659 nationally
Redlands
66.3
#1561 nationally
Redlands leads in walk score (40 vs 25). Redlands leads in crime level (8.2 vs 11.5). Redlands leads in median household income ($94,473 vs $70,451).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Murfreesboro, TN | Redlands, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 65 (#1659) | 66.3 (#1561) |
| Population | 165,430 | 72,556 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $430,142 | $639,363 |
| Median Household Income | $70,451 | $94,473 |
| Average Commute | 27.3 min | 24.9 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 11.5 | 8.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 109 | 144 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.8 | R+2.1 |
D
65 Score
Murfreesboro, TN
Mid-size Tennessee city with community character
Median Home
$430,142
Population
165,430
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southeast
View Murfreesboro, TN →
D
66.3 Score
Redlands, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$639,363
Population
72,556
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
40
Pacific
View Redlands, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Murfreesboro for: