Murray, UT vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Murray
68.2
#1336 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Murray leads in average commute (20.4 min vs 33 min). Murray leads in cost of living index (117 vs 159). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $81,693).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Murray, UT | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.2 (#1336) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 49,553 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $553,605 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $81,693 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 20.4 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 7.6 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 117 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.2 | R+2.1 |
D+
68.2 Score
Murray, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$553,605
Population
49,553
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
West
View Murray, UT →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Murray for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: