Newark, CA vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Newark
62.4
#1861 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Newark leads in median household income ($159,465 vs $66,859). Pittsfield leads in cost of living index (107 vs 195). Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 31.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Newark, CA | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1861) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 46,929 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,202,648 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $159,465 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 31.2 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 57 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 10.4 | 14.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 195 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | D+39.9 |
D-
62.4 Score
Newark, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,202,648
Population
46,929
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
57
Pacific
View Newark, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →