Newark, CA vs Ridgeland, MS
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Newark
62.4
#1861 nationally
Ridgeland
74.4
#603 nationally
Newark leads in median household income ($159,465 vs $66,171). Ridgeland leads in cost of living index (99 vs 195). Newark leads in walk score (57 vs 31).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Newark, CA | Ridgeland, MS |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1861) | 74.4 (#603) |
| Population | 46,929 | 24,459 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,202,648 | $286,933 |
| Median Household Income | $159,465 | $66,171 |
| Average Commute | 31.2 min | 20.1 min |
| Walk Score | 57 | 31 |
| Crime Level | 10.4 | 8.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 195 | 99 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | R+17.3 |
D-
62.4 Score
Newark, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,202,648
Population
46,929
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
57
Pacific
View Newark, CA →
C
74.4 Score
Ridgeland, MS
Small Mississippi city with local appeal
Median Home
$286,933
Population
24,459
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
31
Southeast
View Ridgeland, MS →