Niagara Falls, NY vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Niagara Falls
78.8
#160 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Niagara Falls leads in cost of living index (92 vs 197). Pasadena leads in median household income ($97,818 vs $45,932). Niagara Falls leads in average commute (18.8 min vs 27.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Niagara Falls, NY | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 78.8 (#160) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 47,599 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $175,991 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $45,932 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 18.8 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 51 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 13.7 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 92 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+14.9 | D+32.9 |
C+
78.8 Score
Niagara Falls, NY
Small New York city with local appeal
Median Home
$175,991
Population
47,599
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
51
Northeast
View Niagara Falls, NY →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Niagara Falls for: