O'Fallon, IL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 25). O'Fallon leads in crime level (5.3 vs 8.0). O'Fallon leads in cost of living index (106 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | O'Fallon, IL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,968 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $0 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $102,560 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 26 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 25 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.3 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 106 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+7.9 | R+2.1 |
—
Score
O'Fallon, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Population
31,968
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
25
Median Income
$102,560
Midwest
View O'Fallon, IL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap O'Fallon for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: