Palisades Park, NJ vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Palisades Park
69.7
#1176 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Palisades Park leads in crime level (0.7 vs 13.2). Palisades Park leads in cost of living index (161 vs 197). Palisades Park leads in walk score (81 vs 69).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Palisades Park, NJ | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.7 (#1176) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 20,102 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,015,171 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $93,250 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 32.7 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 81 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 0.7 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 161 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+3.4 | D+32.9 |
D+
69.7 Score
Palisades Park, NJ
Small New Jersey city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,015,171
Population
20,102
Crime
Very Low
Walk Score
81
Northeast
View Palisades Park, NJ →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Palisades Park for: