Pasadena, CA vs Portland, ME
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Portland
72.9
#814 nationally
Portland leads in cost of living index (118 vs 197). Pasadena leads in median household income ($97,818 vs $71,853). Portland leads in average commute (21.2 min vs 27.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pasadena, CA | Portland, ME |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.6 (#1898) | 72.9 (#814) |
| Population | 133,560 | 68,408 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,206,740 | $566,902 |
| Median Household Income | $97,818 | $71,853 |
| Average Commute | 27.9 min | 21.2 min |
| Walk Score | 69 | 65 |
| Crime Level | 13.2 | Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 7.4 |
| Cost of Living Index | 197 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+36.3 |
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
C-
72.9 Score
Portland, ME
Foodie paradise on the coast
Median Home
$566,902
Population
68,408
Crime
Low
Schools
B+
Northeast
View Portland, ME →
Try a different matchup
Swap Pasadena for: