Pasadena, CA vs Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Rancho Palos Verdes
61.8
#1890 nationally
Rancho Palos Verdes leads in crime level (2.5 vs 13.2). Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 28). Rancho Palos Verdes leads in median household income ($166,747 vs $97,818).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pasadena, CA | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.6 (#1898) | 61.8 (#1890) |
| Population | 133,560 | 39,980 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,206,740 | $1,827,501 |
| Median Household Income | $97,818 | $166,747 |
| Average Commute | 27.9 min | 33.3 min |
| Walk Score | 69 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 13.2 | 2.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 197 | 242 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+32.9 |
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
D-
61.8 Score
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,827,501
Population
39,980
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Pacific
View Rancho Palos Verdes, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Pasadena for:
Swap Rancho Palos Verdes for: