Pasadena, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in crime level (6.3 vs 13.2). Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 35). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 197).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pasadena, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.6 (#1898) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 133,560 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,206,740 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $97,818 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 27.9 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 69 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 13.2 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 197 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+10.2 |
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Pasadena for: