Pasadena, CA vs Tucker, GA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Tucker
62.2
#1871 nationally
Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 22). Pasadena leads in median household income ($97,818 vs $80,311). Pasadena leads in average commute (27.9 min vs 29.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pasadena, CA | Tucker, GA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.6 (#1898) | 62.2 (#1871) |
| Population | 133,560 | 36,975 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,206,740 | $391,590 |
| Median Household Income | $97,818 | $80,311 |
| Average Commute | 27.9 min | 29.8 min |
| Walk Score | 69 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 13.2 | N/A |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 197 | N/A |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+64.8 |
Data coverage note: Tucker is missing data for 1 metric that Pasadena has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
D-
62.2 Score
Tucker, GA
Small Georgia city with local appeal
Median Home
$391,590
Population
36,975
Walk Score
22
Median Income
$80,311
Southeast
View Tucker, GA →