Pasadena, TX vs Sanger, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pasadena
75.2
#490 nationally
Sanger
68
#1364 nationally
Pasadena leads in cost of living index (94 vs 120). Sanger leads in crime level (13.3 vs 15.5). Sanger leads in walk score (48 vs 43).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pasadena, TX | Sanger, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 75.2 (#490) | 68 (#1364) |
| Population | 146,716 | 26,343 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $218,827 | $416,982 |
| Median Household Income | $64,698 | $69,333 |
| Average Commute | 25.7 min | 24.1 min |
| Walk Score | 43 | 48 |
| Crime Level | 15.5 | 13.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 94 | 120 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+5.5 | R+4.4 |
C
75.2 Score
Pasadena, TX
Mid-size Texas city with community character
Median Home
$218,827
Population
146,716
Crime
High
Walk Score
43
Southwest
View Pasadena, TX →
D+
68 Score
Sanger, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$416,982
Population
26,343
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Sanger, CA →