Pittsburg, CA vs San Fernando, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pittsburg
62
#1881 nationally
San Fernando
65.7
#1616 nationally
San Fernando leads in walk score (79 vs 39). Pittsburg leads in median household income ($98,408 vs $70,950). San Fernando leads in average commute (29.5 min vs 39.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pittsburg, CA | San Fernando, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62 (#1881) | 65.7 (#1616) |
| Population | 75,803 | 23,364 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $566,408 | $752,797 |
| Median Household Income | $98,408 | $70,950 |
| Average Commute | 39.2 min | 29.5 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 79 |
| Crime Level | 12.6 | 9.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 146 | 150 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+38.0 | D+32.9 |
D-
62 Score
Pittsburg, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$566,408
Population
75,803
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Pittsburg, CA →
D
65.7 Score
San Fernando, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$752,797
Population
23,364
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
79
Pacific
View San Fernando, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Pittsburg for: