Pittsfield, MA vs Selma, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Selma
66.2
#1578 nationally
Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 23.5 min). Pittsfield leads in median household income ($66,859 vs $53,874). Selma leads in walk score (47 vs 40).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Pittsfield, MA | Selma, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.6 (#864) | 66.2 (#1578) |
| Population | 43,076 | 24,467 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $313,325 | $364,110 |
| Median Household Income | $66,859 | $53,874 |
| Average Commute | 17.8 min | 23.5 min |
| Walk Score | 40 | 47 |
| Crime Level | 14.0 | 15.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 107 | 115 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+39.9 | R+4.4 |
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →
D
66.2 Score
Selma, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$364,110
Population
24,467
Crime
High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Selma, CA →