Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Spanish Fork, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Spanish Fork
72.6
#866 nationally
Spanish Fork leads in crime level (2.1 vs 8.0). Spanish Fork leads in average commute (20.2 min vs 33 min). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 30).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Spanish Fork, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1806) | 72.6 (#866) |
| Population | 174,405 | 45,557 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $788,806 | $520,115 |
| Median Household Income | $105,534 | $93,989 |
| Average Commute | 33 min | 20.2 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | 30 |
| Crime Level | 8.0 | 2.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 159 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+39.8 |
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Spanish Fork, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$520,115
Population
45,557
Crime
Low
Walk Score
30
West
View Spanish Fork, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: