Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 15). Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 33 min). Washington leads in crime level (4.1 vs 8.0).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63 (#1806) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 174,405 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $788,806 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $105,534 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 33 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | 15 |
| Crime Level | 8.0 | 4.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 159 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+52.3 |
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: