Richland, WA vs Sanger, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Richland
69.9
#1159 nationally
Sanger
68
#1364 nationally
Richland leads in crime level (6.9 vs 13.3). Sanger leads in walk score (48 vs 34). Richland leads in median household income ($89,283 vs $69,333).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Richland, WA | Sanger, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.9 (#1159) | 68 (#1364) |
| Population | 63,757 | 26,343 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $470,131 | $416,982 |
| Median Household Income | $89,283 | $69,333 |
| Average Commute | 20.7 min | 24.1 min |
| Walk Score | 34 | 48 |
| Crime Level | 6.9 | 13.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 120 | 120 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.9 | R+4.4 |
D+
69.9 Score
Richland, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$470,131
Population
63,757
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
34
Pacific
View Richland, WA →
D+
68 Score
Sanger, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$416,982
Population
26,343
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Sanger, CA →