Rolling Meadows, IL vs Worcester, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rolling Meadows
77.3
#260 nationally
Worcester
66.6
#1530 nationally
Rolling Meadows leads in median household income ($91,287 vs $52,891). Worcester leads in walk score (62 vs 42). Worcester leads in cost of living index (108 vs 111).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rolling Meadows, IL | Worcester, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 77.3 (#260) | 66.6 (#1530) |
| Population | 23,329 | 206,518 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $342,521 | $441,802 |
| Median Household Income | $91,287 | $52,891 |
| Average Commute | 26.6 min | 26.4 min |
| Walk Score | 42 | 62 |
| Crime Level | 2.7 | Moderate-High |
| School Rating | N/A | 5.2 |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+42.0 | D+10.0 |
C+
77.3 Score
Rolling Meadows, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$342,521
Population
23,329
Crime
Low
Walk Score
42
Midwest
View Rolling Meadows, IL →
D
66.6 Score
Worcester, MA
Heart of the Commonwealth
Median Home
$441,802
Population
206,518
Crime
Moderate-High
Schools
C
Northeast
View Worcester, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rolling Meadows for: