Rosemount, MN vs Spanish Fork, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Rosemount
74.7
#569 nationally
Spanish Fork
72.6
#866 nationally
Spanish Fork leads in walk score (30 vs 20). Spanish Fork leads in average commute (20.2 min vs 28.5 min). Rosemount leads in median household income ($127,252 vs $93,989).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Rosemount, MN | Spanish Fork, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 74.7 (#569) | 72.6 (#866) |
| Population | 27,590 | 45,557 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $438,376 | $520,115 |
| Median Household Income | $127,252 | $93,989 |
| Average Commute | 28.5 min | 20.2 min |
| Walk Score | 20 | 30 |
| Crime Level | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+12.9 | R+39.8 |
C
74.7 Score
Rosemount, MN
Small Minnesota city with local appeal
Median Home
$438,376
Population
27,590
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
Midwest
View Rosemount, MN →
C-
72.6 Score
Spanish Fork, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$520,115
Population
45,557
Crime
Low
Walk Score
30
West
View Spanish Fork, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Rosemount for: