Salisbury, NC vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Salisbury
66.6
#1526 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in crime level (5.8 vs 26.3). South Pasadena leads in median household income ($127,882 vs $48,888). South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 27).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Salisbury, NC | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.6 (#1526) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 36,319 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $284,346 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $48,888 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 21.8 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 27 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 26.3 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 94 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+35.9 | D+32.9 |
D
66.6 Score
Salisbury, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$284,346
Population
36,319
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
27
Southeast
View Salisbury, NC →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Salisbury for: