San Bruno, CA vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
San Bruno
63.5
#1767 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
San Bruno leads in walk score (56 vs 15). Washington leads in cost of living index (122 vs 214). Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 26.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | San Bruno, CA | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.5 (#1767) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 41,327 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,308,809 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $131,669 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 26.3 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 56 | 15 |
| Crime Level | 7.0 | 4.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 214 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | R+52.3 |
D
63.5 Score
San Bruno, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,308,809
Population
41,327
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
56
Pacific
View San Bruno, CA →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap San Bruno for: