South Pasadena, CA vs West Melbourne, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
West Melbourne
72.6
#867 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 22). West Melbourne leads in cost of living index (114 vs 228). South Pasadena leads in median household income ($127,882 vs $86,398).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | South Pasadena, CA | West Melbourne, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.6 (#1760) | 72.6 (#867) |
| Population | 25,623 | 29,144 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,707,701 | $374,472 |
| Median Household Income | $127,882 | $86,398 |
| Average Commute | 30.6 min | 23.5 min |
| Walk Score | 67 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 5.8 | 4.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 228 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+20.8 |
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
West Melbourne, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,472
Population
29,144
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
22
Southeast
View West Melbourne, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap South Pasadena for: