Anderson, SC vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Anderson
67.7
#1389 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 15.4). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $40,445). Anderson leads in cost of living index (93 vs 114).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Anderson, SC | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.7 (#1389) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 29,980 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $274,358 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $40,445 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 20.7 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 30 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 15.4 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 93 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+47.4 | R+24.9 |
D+
67.7 Score
Anderson, SC
Small South Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$274,358
Population
29,980
Crime
High
Walk Score
30
Southeast
View Anderson, SC →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →