Auburn, ME vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Auburn
72.7
#837 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 5.9). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $59,659). Auburn leads in walk score (35 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Auburn, ME | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#837) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 24,793 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $333,086 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $59,659 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 23 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 35 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 5.9 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 101 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.1 | R+24.9 |
C-
72.7 Score
Auburn, ME
Small Maine city with local appeal
Median Home
$333,086
Population
24,793
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
35
Northeast
View Auburn, ME →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →